|19||The 10th Annual Independent Show|
|3||Quarterly Telecommunications Reporting Worksheet - Form 499A|
|31||Copyright Statement of Accounts|
|1||Local Telephone Competition and Broadband Reporting - Form 477|
|30||Annual EEO Report - Form 396-C|
PITTSBURGH, April 26, 2011 - In comments filed with the U.S. Copyright office, a coalition representing hundreds of rural pay-TV providers is supporting retention of the compulsory license system that allows cable operators to retransmit broadcast TV signals in a cost-efficient manner, fairly compensates copyright holders and shields small pay-TV providers from incurring large costs associated with the negotiation of thousands of copyright transactions on an individual basis.
"This is a classic case of ‘If it ain't broke, don't fix it," American Cable Association President and CEO Matthew M. Polka said. "The current system has served the needs of everyone well for more than thirty years. All of the proposed alternatives to the current compulsory licensing system would be a step backward and hurt consumers served by ACA members."
Support for current law came in an April 25 filing by the Rural MVPD Group, which includes ACA; the National Telecommunications Cooperative Association (NTCA); the Organization for the Promotion and Advancement of Small Telecommunications Companies (OPASTCO); and the Western Telecommunications Alliance (WTA).
The U.S. Copyright Office has been tasked by Congress with drafting a report on the continued efficacy of the compulsory license regime put in place by federal law in 1976. The Rural MVPD Group's comments came in response to a Notice of Inquiry (NOI) issued by the Copyright Office on March 3, 2011.
In the comments, the Rural MVPD Group stressed that compulsory licensing is an efficient mechanism for copyright clearance of broadcast signals and serves to preserve a multiplicity of information sources. Elimination of compulsory licensing would probably put many financially marginal TV stations that rely on must carry out of business and swell transaction costs for small pay-TV providers forced to conduct a countless number of discrete copyright negotiations, the Rural MVPD Group said.
"Phasing out the cable compulsory license with no clear justification in support would pose a significant costly and disruptive burden on small rural providers-and ultimately the consumers they serve," Shirley Bloomfield, CEO of the National Telecommunications Cooperative Association, said.
To the extent the Copyright Office advances a copyright clearance system in lieu of the compulsory license, the Rural MVPD Group recommended concurrent reform of the retransmission consent laws and regulations because of their close relationship to copyright law, and in light of the broadcasters' escalating cash demands in exchange for pay-TV distribution and the Big 4 networks' and sports leagues' recent demands for a significant cut of the take.
"The Copyright Office must review to what extent copyright holders are already being fully compensated, or even over-compensated, through retransmission consent. The review should also analyze to what extent eliminating the statutory license and replacing it with another regime would be to the detriment of small pay-TV providers," OPASTCO President John N. Rose said.
Any phase-out of the compulsory license should address the harm to smaller MVPDs (Multichannel Video Programming Distributors), the Rural MVPD Group said. At a minimum, a replacement system should prohibit discriminatory license fees charged to small pay-TV providers, and big markets dominated by large cable operators should go first under any staggered approach adopted. Big MVPDs have far more resources to deal with the costs, disruption and uncertainty that will follow any elimination of the compulsory license.
The Rural MVPD Group also explained that the compulsory license for broadcast signals is deeply intertwined not only with retransmission consent but also with other major Federal Communications Commission regulations, including must carry, network non-duplication, syndicated exclusivity, sports blackouts and significantly viewed status. As a result, calls for copyright parity between broadcast signals and cable programming networks (which are not covered by these FCC rules) are an untenable goal.
"Both the Copyright Office and the FCC have recognized
the extensive regulatory framework governing pay-TV carriage of broadcast
stations, concluding that changes to broadcast signal carriage regulations
cannot be considered in isolation. The heavily regulated nature of broadcast
signal carriage alone provides ample basis to distinguish broadcast channels
from cable channels," Kelly Worthington, Executive Vice President of the
Western Telecommunications Alliance, said.
About the Rural MVPD Group:
The American Cable Association, based in Pittsburgh, is a trade organization representing nearly 900 smaller and medium-sized, independent cable companies who provide broadband services for more than 7.6 million cable subscribers primarily located in rural and smaller suburban markets across America. Visit us at: http://www.americancable.org/
The National Telecommunications Cooperative Association represents over 570 small and rural telephone cooperatives and commercial companies providing service to approximately 40 percent of the rural area of the United States. Visit us at: http://www.ntca.org/
The Organization for the Promotion and Advancement of
Small Telecommunications Companies is a leading voice for
rural telecommunications, representing approximately 470 small incumbent local
exchange carriers serving rural areas of the United States. Its members include
both commercial companies and cooperatives, which collectively serve more than
3 million customers. Visit us at www.opastco.org.
Western Telecommunications Alliance represents over 250 small rural local exchange providers in the 24 states west of the Mississippi River. Visit us at: http://www.w-t-a.org
Please use the information below to get in touch with the American Cable Association.